Mr.T wrote:
wrote in message
oups.com...
Nice try Arnold. But I rely on my ears you rely on audio religion.

That's your problem, you rely on your "ears" which are obviously faulty,
Arny relies on test equipment.

That says it all. The ears are wrong the test equipment is right.

Yes, in absolute terms,

Absolute terms? LOL do you guys have something similar to a cross to
represent your religion? It would be nice if we can ID you guys from a
distance.


because the ONLY person in the world who has your
ears is YOU.

Oh, now there is a revelation. I suppose in your version of your audio
religion each individual has their own truly and completely unique
hearing? There is no common ground amoung humans when it comes to sound
perception? It's funny how you guys like to whine about the lack of
controled listening in audio yet very few of you guys really know jack
about psychoacoustics. But.... since I buy audio equipment and records
and Cds to please me...




What you *think* is good is a PREFERENCE you are entitled to, nothing more.

Dude, since when did you have ANY say so as to what I am entitled to?



Your
an official meter reader. Ever listen to music? I thought not.

You thought wrong then!

Oh, well then do tell us about your experience in comparing the various
masterings of your favorite titles. I bet you have nothing to say about
it. Quick, do an Arny and google other peoples' views on the subject
then do a Howaard Ferstler and plagarize them.





Anybody relying on their "ears" alone, should NOT be arguing anything in
a
*technical* forum!

This is a technical forum? You really are a ****ing moron.

The man claiming rec,audio.TECH, is NOT a technical forum is calling ME a
moron :-) :-) :-)


Dude, I am posting on UK.rec,audio




Says it all I guess.


Um yeah, Says it all. I guess.



Scott