wrote in message
ups.com
Dave Plowman (News) wrote:
In article

.com,
wrote:
I have actually. that is one of the many reasons I get
such a laugh at the idiots on Usenet and their complete
misapplication and misinerpretation of psychoacoustics.
The idea that human hearing is wrong while technical
measurements are right when it comes to this hobby is a
prime example of that misapplication.

What you obviously don't realise is just how poor the
ear's 'memory' is and how easily it is fooled by other
factors.

Another meter reader building an argument based on made
up facts.

Not at all. It's not our fault that you appear to be so poorly informed,
Scott.

Have you ever read this book or anything similar?

E. Zwicker and H. Fastl, Psychoacoustics Facts and Models, Springer Verlag,
1990.