"P.W.B. Electronics" wrote in message
...
New Article by May Belt - Positive Feedback Online

Dear All,
There is an interesting (if I do say it myself) article just published in
the March 2007 issue of Positive Feedback Online.

http://www.positive-feedback.com/Issue30/belt.htm

In the 3rd paragraph of the article there is a link available to a section
of the Stereophile Hi Fi magazine's on line Forum (copy below).

http://forum.stereophile.com/forum/s...fpart=1&vc= 1

This particular section in the Stereophile Forum is very long (spread over
quite a few months) but I would recommend that people try to read it all
because I have written much background information regarding some of the
discoveries by P.W.B. Electronics.

I would be interested in any feedback from my article - either posted to
the
P.W.B. Forum or directly to myself.

Kind Regards,

May Belt.




*
* P.W.B. Electronics
* 18 Pasture Crescent, Leeds, West Yorkshire, LS7 4QS, England
*
* http://www.belt.demon.co.uk http://groups.yahoo.com/group/PWB
*


Mrs Belt writes reasonably and gently, but can't get away from the fact that
PWB's "improvements" do not have rational, measurable and repeatable reasons
for their effectiveness. I would be happy if PWB would propose some
rational, measurable and repeatable reasons, so that others could replicate
his work and carry out proper double-blind tests. Anything less, and the
suspicion of "snake oil" remains.

If something works, then the effect *must* be measurable. It is, of course,
possible that others have been measuring the wrong things, but then this
leaves an obligation on PWB to propose the right measurements that others
can perform.

S.