On Jun 3, 5:11 pm, beerbarrel wrote:
On May 30, 2:08 pm, Peter Wieck wrote:





On May 29, 10:08 am, John Byrns wrote:

SNIP he seems to have concocted his "apology" as an exit
strategy, and decided to lay low to give his reputation a chance to
recover.

John:

After realizing that Mr. Jute is brain-damaged quite literally, my
ethics required giving him an apology. And given that his handicap is
permanent and apparently degenerating further, I will refrain from
further direct attacks out of pity.

You are the first to defend him, generally. You must have known him
before his strokes and/or seen direct physical evidence of his claims.
For those of us who have seen no such thing excepting those offerings
he has made here together with his pretty wild claims (such as a jack-
booted visit to Peter Drucker, walking up a mountain with a gentleman
4-years dead, a teen-age speech to the Knesset and more than a few
others), without the additional knowledge of his brain-damage he would
be a very difficult individual to take seriously. But at this point,
he must be taken 'as seriously as a stroke' with the attendant
necessary accommodations as one would for any other challenged person.

Peter Wieck
Wyncote, PA

I think worthless went cuckoo for coca puffs!

Again!- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

And you? Apart from being a simple waste of air, water, food and
space, you sole objective in life appears to be nattering at the
ankles of your betters... Which would in this case include even the
likes of Skippy, Jute and Nudo as it happens.

Peter Wieck
Wyncote, PA