View Single Post
  #19 (permalink)  
Old July 5th 07, 11:29 AM posted to uk.rec.audio
Keith G
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 7,388
Default Blu Ray vs. HD-DVD (Keith- read this)


"Don Pearce" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 5 Jul 2007 01:07:12 +0100, "Keith G"
wrote:




Not quite - it's a digital photo of a 'freeze frame' so it hasn't been
done any favours, but I think it clearly shows the origin of the
'sandy'
effect on skintones in the (promotional) clip I saw.




But not this bit:


I've been increasingly unimpressed by the hi-def images I've been
seeing too - not dissimilar to how you describe things and the image
you've linked to. So much so, I've given up on the current "state of
the art" and picked up (well, with the help of a couple of other
strapping blokes!) a Toshiba 36" CRT for £125. Whilst far from
perfect, it beats the pants off most of the HD images I've seen in
shop displays and at friends and family. I really had high hopes for
HD too.

CRTs still beat the crap out of LCD or plasma when it comes to
reproducing colour. The flat screen stuff always looks like the colour
has been laid on afterwards as a sort of molten plasticky layer, with
scant regard for fine tone - a bit like a child's first go at painting
by numbers. CRTs make a vastly better job of this.




I don't even like 'flat screens' on small tellies - they look *pushed
in* to me....