View Single Post
  #141 (permalink)  
Old September 2nd 07, 09:29 PM posted to rec.audio.opinion,rec.audio.tech,rec.audio.tubes,uk.rec.audio
Arny Krueger
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,850
Default Here we go again!


"Keith G" wrote in message
...

"Arny Krueger" wrote in message
...

"Keith G" wrote in message
...

"Mr.T" MrT@home wrote in message
...

"Rob" wrote in message
...
My take is that they PREFER the so called "euphonic distortions",

Prefer the sound, OK. I think you just have to take a deep breath,
relax, and get over it.

And IF they did, these debates would have finished 25 years ago.
Some people still listen to wax cylinders, without needing to "prove"
they
are better than CD


I don't know a single soul who plays LPs who feels he needs to *prove*
anything....


It is not the playing LPs that indicates a need to prove anything, it is
the continual ranting and raving on audio newsgroups about the technical
superiority of the LP that tells us about their state of mind.



The only people who combine the words 'technical superiority', 'LP' or
'vinyl' in a sentence *without* the 'couldn't care less' qualifier is you
mostly and occasionally a couple of other people who quite obviously feel
threatened by it all or just want to grab a little 'airtime' on a
deliberately provocative, crossposted thread...


Convenient Keith how quickly you want to forget the content of the OP that
kicked the whole thread off. It's a published article from MSN claiming
technical superiority for the LP format.

My biggest concern about playing LPs is the ongoing degradation of what
should be archival media.


Your nagging anxieties are not my nagging anxieties...


Where did I say anything about nagging anxieties, Keith? Having problem with
an overactive projection gland?