Why "accuracy"?
In rec.audio.tech Peter Wieck wrote:
On Sep 6, 9:57 am, "Arny Krueger" wrote:
As I suspected Peter, you hold facts and fantasy as having equal value.
Fanatics, even fanatics aligned to one's own beliefs
remain fanatics. Dangerous, poisonous, unhappy, pitiable,
contemptible.
Especially true for people who see fanatics under many beds and wish to seek
them out and destory them.
No, I have long-since removed the legs from my bed so as to preclude
monsters and fanatics. I would also change that "destroy" to "expose".
Fruits, nuts, fanatics and clowns are best kept in the open where they
may be alternately amusing or object lessons as the case merits.
As to "facts" and "fantasy", whose would they be? That is the problem
with closely held beliefs and those who hold them.
And again: do you have any 'closely held' beliefs, in any sphere? Or have you simply defined
'closely held belief' as, 'whatever I don't think is true'?
___
-S
"As human beings, we understand the world through simile, analogy,
metaphor, narrative and, sometimes, claymation." - B. Mason
|