On Sep 9, 7:04 am, "Arny Krueger" wrote:
"Mr.T" MrT@home wrote in message

...



"Peter Wieck" wrote in message
roups.com...
Arny:
There are seven classical fallacies. You are prone to two and subject
to one more.
Name them, please.

The first is pretty obvious : Arguing with fools.


That is not a fallacy. Just an exercise in futility.

But as Mr. Krueger's recent foray into High-End clearly illustrates,
he is quite *subject* to leaping to conclusions. He is prone to false
premises and to circular reasoning.

In the reference discussion, he suggested that a study referencing 35
- 75 second listening samples and stating that listeners heard little
difference between them is transferrable from sight-impared
individuals using transcription services to general audio listeners in
short and long term auditions. That would be Leaping to Conclusions.

He expects that one must parse all that he writes and respond point-by-
tiresome, repetitive, and typically misrepresentative point. That
falls generally under the False Premises fallacy.

Further, he has no ability to parse the writing of others except in
the same tiresome way, all the while searching for that tangent tp
follow that will divert from the subject at hand and add yet one more
layer of smoke to the discussion. That falls generally under the
Circular Reasoning fallacy.

Peter Wieck
Wyncote, PA
Kutztown Space 338