On Sep 19, 8:28 pm, Chris Hornbeck
wrote:
On Wed, 19 Sep 2007 16:25:36 -0700, wrote:

Something

Any chance you could manage to keep this nut-job
stuff out of r.a.t?
I have a right to defend myself against the character assassination
of scum like Worthless Wiecky. When over a period two years Worthless
Wiecky hounded my every post with bullying and attempted blackmail, I
didn't hear a single word of objection from you.

Peter Wieck tried to blackmail me by first persecuting me without
provocation and then offering to cease and desist if I would "stop
prosetylizing". Now you're trying to apply moral blackmail.

I don't succumb to blackmail. I publish and damn the blackmailer.

You're embarassing yourself, and everyone else here.

To quote a protege whose book I'm just editing as I dictate this to
you: "A friend who can be embarrassed by me, isn't."

Thanks, I hope,

In good time, when I finish, gratitude will be graciously received..

Chris Hornbeck

wrote:
I've been very careful not to drag the organising club of the Kutztown
Radio Meet into the nightcart-load of trouble Peter Wieck has brought
upon himself. Gray Glasser went further and removed them from
suspicion by saying "the Delaware Valley Historic Radio Club (DVHRC)
is reputable and respectable". But now some thoughtless fulminator
from the DVHRC has taken it on himself to give an opinion, in a
tribute thread to Worthless Wiecky no less! Bending over backwards to
be fair, I have waited over a day for calmer heads to prevail and the
retraction to arrive. It hasn't happened.

On Sep 18, 5:33 pm, " wrote:
On behalf of the DVHRC, we have been silent in regards to the prior
posts, for the obvious reason that they do not deserve a response.

Perhaps you will tell us, Mr Saegers, or whatever your name is, since
the DVHRC is now officially taking a position that the "prior
posts ... do not deserve a response", which prior posts are the DVHRC
thereby condemning?

Are you describing the posts supporting Peter Wieck as beneath a
response?

Are you describing the posts accusing Peter Wieck of crapping in other
people's houses as beneath a response?

Rather than choosing the lose-lose option of taking sides, you would
have been so much smarter to remain silent.

With sympathy,

Andre Jute
"Blessed is the man who, having nothing to say, abstains from giving
us wordly evidence of the fact."-- George Elliot