On Sep 20, 10:18 pm, "Phil Nelson" wrote:
[[[Exray wrote:]]]
Lets make a deal.

Exray, welcome back to the rec.antiques.radio+phono newsgroup.

Kindly take my advice

Your advice might be worth something as soon as you inform yourself of
the cause of your problem, and put your mind in gear.

Read on, broaden your education. Let me show you a way forward.

and don't respond in ANY way to these offensive posts.

They could be a lot less offensive. They will become even more
harrowing if more of you don't take Menninger and Bill's viewpoint.

As you no doubt recall, any sort of response simply motivates crazies

I'm happy for idiots like you who don't do their homework, who don't
even read the threads, to believe that I am an unpredictable crazy. If
you're merely selfishly self-centered, then no one can help you
against an unpredictable crazy when you're reckless enough to put
yourself in his face.

and
trolls to spew more garbage.

You should look up the official internet definition of troll. It isn't
the standard English one. Until you get the terminology right, we
can't even tell with certainty what you intend to say.

As for garbage, read on, see who offers a positive solution rather
than the bluster you offer.

All they want is attention -- positive,
negative, it doesn't matter.

You're not too bright, are you, Phil? This is happening to you not
because I want attention (why should I want the attention of
insensitive, slack blusterers like you? -- put your mind in gear,
man!) but because I am getting too much attention of the wrong kind
from the blackmailer Peter Wieck who uses my hobby group RAT as a
toilet and has stalked me now for two years with hundreds of
denigratory messages. (Next week I shall publish some essays examining
the reasons why Worthless Wiecky is a stalker. You might study them
with profit.)

Since Worthless Wiecky apparently values your good opinion, I'm
plastering up a warning right in his hometown.

I have a genuine grievance. I am the victim of a bully. When I
complained about it, you lot protected your bully, the wretched Peter
Wieck. That emotional midget Steph Weil even suggested the victim
caused his own victimization (a very careless way of speaking for
someone called Weil -- next week I shall publish an essay on
congenital fascism that might interest her). Now I'm going to peel you
off one by one from Bullyboy Wieck, and then deal with him. When I
finish with him, I shall be around to deal with anyone who committed
immoral acts in his defence. Messages wishing me dead have already
appeared. Little garage traders who value calm trading conditions more
than justice (makes one think of the French under Vichy) made
unsupportable offensive remarks though I imagine the survivors will
switch sides to avoid becoming Darwinian accidents; I already have a
few letters to my fiultra mailbox claiming their senders have nothing
to do with Worthless Wiecky. Baby hyenas are darting in trying to tear
off a mouthful of flesh.

Thus, and with good reason, for the rest of you I feel as little
sympathy as the fascist Peter Wieck feels for me and my associates on
RAT.

They have mental health issues.

You really should attempt to understand the issues, sonny, before you
make these offensive kneejerk pronouncements.

Ignore them, or
even better, filter out all of their posts if your software permits.

That's good advice to an ignorant blusterer like you; you should take
it. Your pronunciamento cause more harm than good, as we're proving
sentence by sentence. You are contributing nothing towards a solution,
in fact putting a solution further out of reach.

Meanwhile, we can all engage in substantive, on-topic discussions about
antique radios and phonos :-)

Sure you can, as long as there is something left of your newsgroup
when at last you decide to pick up Worthless Wiecky by the scruff of
his neck, shake him vigorously to get his attention, and explain to
him that if he doesn't stop bringing down this sort of punishment on
you by his viciousness, you will ostracize him.

See, even "crazies" make positive, workable suggestions, instead of
the blustering pointlessness of your contribution. By the way, it is
the same suggestion Jim Menninger made on Day One. Will you call him
crazy too? And now your old mate BIll has made the same breakthrough.
Will you call him, too, crazy?

You got craziness on the mind, Phil, and it is not helping. Try to
think positively, if you can. If your knees are jerking, take a nap
until the symptoms of stupidity pass. At least, when you're lying
down, no one can accuse you of being a walking cliche.

Phil


*****

THIS IS WHAT POOR OLD PHIL NELSON IS SO UPSET about:

On Sep 20, 6:50 pm, wrote:
On Sep 20, 6:47 pm, Andre Jute wrote:

I assume you two socketpuppets escaped from the village idiot
freakshow.

For only a village idiot can fail to understand that I am not the
bully but the victim. What is happening here is my protest against the
hundreds of character assassinations the scumball Worthless Peter
Wieck sent to RAT about me over the last two years. Peter Wieck is the
bully. The evidence stands on RAT, if you two clowns can read.

Lets make a deal. Trade Village Idiots. We RAR+P'rs take back Peter
Wieck as a worthwhile radio guy and offer you in trade Steven Dinius
who seems to fit like a glove in your style of discussions. Or as
Steven might say, "the hubcaps cost extra on MTV".

On a bull****/mass formula you RATters would come out as winners

-ex

Yo Ex, you're only the third guy, after Jim Menning and me, to talk
sense in these hundreds of messages. Worthless Wiecky is clearly
schizo, but if you find him useful, you guys should have him.

On RAT he craps on the carpets and pretends to familiarity with his
betters.

Sounds like a good swap: You guarantee I don't ever see Worthless
Wiecky's slack arse again, we'll take care of the other fellow for you
-- sounds like a bright, hitherto misunderstood boy of high spirits.

Andre Jute
Fair trade is no robbery