"Keith G" wrote in message
...

"Andy Evans" wrote in message
oups.com...
"we can see audible flaws" v. "we can see no obviously audible
flaws." (Trevor)

This is really the problem with your thinking here. You can't "see"
sound in its entirity. You can "see" a representation which, like all
representations, is merely acting in place of the original. I can see
quite clearly that your desire to refer your arguments to such
representations is seductive to your own ways of analysis, but it's
clear from our panel of "SET idiots" here that it doesn't satisfy the
musical brains of discriminating listeners who need to actually hear
those minute musical differences which, for instance, discriminate
between a Stradivarius and a practice violin.


There is no big mystery AFAIAC - valves give more clarity, 'air' and
*life* than any SS I've heard; SETs add more depth and better imaging than
PP, making the sound more *natural*....

Is that too simple??

Gosh Keith. You statement that "SETs add more depth and better imaging"
is incredibly deja-vu. It was a comment also made by another poster on
another NG a while ago, in another thread, which you probably have
not seen. Trevor took exception to this immediately, despite the fact
that it is an important and fundamental reason why people choose SET.

Iain