View Single Post
  #3 (permalink)  
Old December 21st 07, 10:26 AM posted to uk.rec.audio
Serge Auckland
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 509
Default What a sad excuse for a group this is...

"borosteve" wrote in message
...
On 21 Dec, 09:23, "David Looser" wrote:
"Eeyore" wrote in message

...

Reviewers who talk of differences in pace, rhythym, speed, darkness and
the like are simply blowing nonsense out of their backsides. If the
they
found no differences, they'd be out of a job, so they make them up and
call them non-scientific names and claim they can't be measured so as
to
ensure their next pay check. Charlatans, the lot of them.


Agreed 100%. I remember the first time I met this sort of thing in a
review,
it was for the original Linn Sondeck turntable. After describing the
"sound"
of this turntable in the sort of overblown language previously only seen
from wine reviewers, the reviewer went on to claim that *any* system
using
this turntable would sound better than any other system that didn't. So
all
the deficiencies of a cheap arm, cartridge, amp or speakers apparently
mattered less than the supposed inferiority of all other turntables.

That was the day I stopped buying Hi-Fi magazines.

David.


WOW! That stirred things up a bit!! So there we have it,Cd players all
sound the same,as do amplifiers.Cables make no difference but speakers
make all the difference. Now I now where I've been gong wrong all
these years.
Thanx guys,
Borosteve.


Glad to have been able to help!
S


--
http://audiopages.googlepages.com