View Single Post
  #5 (permalink)  
Old December 21st 07, 01:26 PM posted to uk.rec.audio
borosteve
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 44
Default What a sad excuse for a group this is...

On 21 Dec, 11:46, Laurence Payne NOSPAMlpayne1ATdsl.pipex.com wrote:
On Fri, 21 Dec 2007 03:22:02 -0800 (PST), borosteve

wrote:
WOW! That stirred things up a bit!! So there we have it,Cd players all
sound the same,as do amplifiers.Cables make no difference but speakers
make all the difference. Now I now where I've been gong wrong all
these years.


No stirring really. That's just the common opinion of people who work
with audio as opposed to audiophile hobbyists. Source quality matters
(and I mean the recording, not what plays it.) Speaker choice and
placement matters. Everything else needs to be competent, and mostly
is these days.


What do you mean by "work with audio"? Do you mean people who use
audio in their work? i.e.musicians,producers etc?Or do you mean people
that repair equipment, like a service engineer? If its the latter then
fair enough. The guy who does my servicing can't tell the difference
between a radiogram and a high end set-up! If its the former then I
can tell you that I have done MANY comparative audio demonstrations of
cd players,amplifiers and the rest to PROFFESSIONAL musicians (most
you will have heard of!) and they appreciate the differences that are
there to hear.Of course recording quality is paramount (silk purse/
sows ear). I suppose its all about experiences, but if you can't tell
the difference in sound between a Quad 34/306 and a Naim nait3....

Merry Xmas,
Borosteve.