On Jan 11, 8:47*am, "David Looser" wrote:
You can call me "an impressionable, credulous fool" if you like. It seems a
seriously over-the-top reaction to my expressing some doubt about your
version of what happened to Lomberg. Lomberg is a propagandist. Sure he's
good at making the stats appear to support his case, but then so do his
opponents.

I agree, if it is only a matter of interpretation, a little light
bandinage between statisticians to while away the boring hours between
filling in eurogrant applications for envirofunds, there's no call for
namecalling. I apologise for calling you a "credulous fool". I mistook
you for one of "the committed".

Andre Jute
Do your duty by society today: kick a Green in the goolies