Thread: Tape and Dolby
View Single Post
  #3 (permalink)  
Old September 7th 08, 01:48 PM posted to uk.rec.audio
Serge Auckland[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 154
Default Tape and Dolby


"David Looser" wrote in message
...
"The Legend Returns" trabant owners club@Nicks place.comco wrote in
message news
About a two years ago, I posted here about tapes. I messed about with my
tape deck for a couple of evenings, then stuck it back in the box and
forgot about it.

Three days ago, I set it up and once again, have just spent two
thoughrougly enjoyable nights putting some music back on tape and I'm now
left scratching my head, why the format has virtually died out?

Using the very cheap but extremely good TDK SA tapes purchased from
Richer Sounds last week and replacing the 99p RCA leads with some much
better but also inexpensive leads http://tinyurl.com/5zzmq5


I'm scratching my head as to why someone who is satisfied with cassette
tape is bothering about leads?


Anyone care to discuss what type of Dolby setting (B, C or S) they used,
the brand/type of tape they used or indeed, still use when tape
recording, or if they think tape could ever make a comeback?


I usually had Dolby switched out. Even with the most expensive cassette
decks there always seemed to be problems with mistracking between the
Dolby encode and decode processes. And with later tape formulations tape
hiss wasn't intrusive.

David.


I used Dolby C, but it was extremely critical of line-up. I can well
understand why anyone without access to test equipment would prefer cassette
without Dolby, even B. However, if the machine was properly lined-up, it
could give truly excellent results, comparable with R-R without Dolby. Tape
saturation wasn't that much of a problem if you kept record levels down, as
Dolby C would take care of the noise.
Of course R-R with Dolby A was a lot better, and a LOT more expensive on
tape costs.
Interesting how it all went away with recording on Hard-Disc.

S.
--
http://audiopages.googlepages.com