"Dave Plowman (News)" wrote in message

In article ,
BBC is biased towards DAB wrote:
I argued that DAB costs aren't intrinsically higher than any other
transmission medium.

But since this is too difficult for you to understand I'll not
bother
again.


And Tony Sayer told you that DAB was intrinsically more expensive.

No actual figures. Easy enough to find out what stations have to
pay - a
very different matter

What would you know about this anyway? Your early comments on this
subject seemed to suggest that you thought that it was mainly down
to
electricity bills, which shows how utterly clueless you are about
the
whole subject of transmission costs.

As I said you never read anything carefully.

But perhaps as an expert on such matters you'd give a breakdown of
the
transmission costs of AM, FM and DAB?


Already done that on uk.tech.digital-tv. If you didn't pay attention I
suggest you toddle over to have a look.


No? Thought as much.


See above.

Now, if you'll excuse me, I have work to do.



--
Steve - www.digitalradiotech.co.uk - Digital Radio News & Info

The adoption of DAB was the most incompetent technical
decision ever made in the history of UK broadcasting:
http://www.digitalradiotech.co.uk/da...ion_of_dab.htm