
July 16th 03, 12:05 AM
posted to uk.rec.audio
|
|
Why do SACDs sound better? (Soft troll)
"RobH" wrote in
message ...
"Mike Fordyce" wrote in message
...
"Dave Plowman" wrote in message
...
In article ,
Clive Backham wrote:
What's left for debate is whether the sampling frequency used for
CD
is already at or beyond the limits of human hearing
It is - when digital was in its infancy I and many of my colleagues
had an
opportunity to play with different sampling rates on a wide variety
of
material. And the point where any difference is detectable is below
that
of CD - *that's* why it was chosen - although the exact rate was
down to
TV video parameters so video recorders could be used.
Wasn't there another reason for choosing this particular sampling
rate - it
allowed storage of approx 1 hour of music on the CD technology
available at
the time?
IIRC it was to get the whole of Beethoven's 9th symphony on a single
disc or is this an urban myth?
http://www.urbanlegends.com/misc/cd/...skeptical.html
|