View Single Post
  #28 (permalink)  
Old March 9th 09, 08:47 AM posted to uk.rec.audio
Iain Churches[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,648
Default Hi-Fi versus monitor speakers


"Dave Plowman (News)" wrote in message
...
In article ,
Iain Churches wrote:
The LF isn't 'weak' - or at least not in a decent room - but not as
extended as would be the norm. They have a pretty sharp cutoff below 42
Hz.


When I was a 2E we carried the ELS down to studio III for some
tests. The general concensus was that the bass was weak, compared with
JBL, Tannoy, Lockwood etc etc. The bass drum sound was very odd,
no "thump" at all, just lots of "whack" as someone described it.


I'm afraid that's because you were used to the sound from those cabinet
speakers where the boxes have a voice of their own. Good deep male speech
proves it - an ELS is far more natural.


I did several spoken word albums for Argo with Richard Burton, and also
many sessions with Sir John Gielgud, and the wonderful Michael Hordern
- maybe the ELS would have been good for those!

But,. as mentioned above, they did not meet anyone' expectations
in pop recording, due probably as you say to the familiarity with
infinite baffled and ported enclosures. In addition, one gained the
impression that the ELS was much too fragile for a Ginger Baker
bass drum:-)

Tannoys and Lockwoods - which used the same drivers - were never known for
their neutrality. Fine speakers though they were.


They were used because they met the expectations of producer,
engineer, client and musician. You can't ask much more than
that, can you?

Iain