"Arny Krueger" wrote in message
...

"David Looser" wrote in message
...
"Arny Krueger" wrote in message
...

"David Looser" wrote in message
...
"Arny Krueger" wrote in message
...

IME studio monitors tend to have more dynamic range

I wonder what you mean by "more dynamic range" in the context of
loudspeakers.

Get loud, clean.

Is this simply a euphemism for "can make a lot of noise"?

No, the sound needs to meet a purity standard.

So yes, your caveat notwithstanding, you are just talking about "loud".
So really "dynamic range" is not the most appropriate phrase to use,
because dynamic range refers to the difference between loud and quiet,
and you are not talking about quiet.

That's a point that I think is moderately well taken.

As a rule I prefer to reserve the term "dynamic range" to programme
material, not equipment. And the sort of use you are have made of it is
why.

Dynamic range is clearly defined for audio equipment:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dynamic_range

"Dynamic range in analog audio is the difference between low-level thermal
noise in the electronic circuitry and high-level signal saturation
resulting in increased distortion and, if pushed higher, clipping.[2] "

That's SNR, it seems pointless to also call it "dynamic range". Programme
material doesn't have a SNR, but it *does* have a dynamic range (the ratio
of the quietest to the loudest wanted signal) and it just seems logical to
me to reserve one term for programme, and the other for equipment.


David.