"Laurence Payne in the Arse ****head "


Most folk have heard of ABX, so I mentioned it as a reference WITHOUT
commenting on how or how well it works.

Some people might not understand that calling it a "fine piece of
design" meant you didn't like it :-)


** The ABX switching box is a device ( ie a piece of design) - and since
I
have never seen one I expressed no personal opinion about it.

However, I made NO mention WHATEVER of the ABX testing procedure - so
it is utterly ** FALSE and ABSURD ** to claim that I praised it.

Comes as no surprise to me that smug, congenital ****heads like Payne and
Arny saw no problem in doing exactly that.

Why don't you write half a page of unemotional reasoned argument on
why you think the ABX method is flawed and/or unnecessarily
complicated?


** Time to go back to what YOU challenged me over:

1. Arny stupidly and falsely claimed here, just yesterday, that I wrote an
article in praise of his ABX comparison system.

2. You then mindlessly chimed in on his side.

3. The facts clearly show both of you to be UTTERLY WRONG.


Now, Arny is a compewter geek and pompous old fool plus a COLOSSAL FAKE
when it comes to matters audio.

OTOH, he is still quite a nice guy compared to utterly ignorant SCUM like
you - Payne.

So kindly drop dead, ASAP.



...... Phil