On Sun, 19 Apr 2009 12:48:19 +0100, Laurence Payne
wrote:

On Sun, 19 Apr 2009 20:58:33 +1000, "Phil Allison"
wrote:

Most folk have heard of ABX, so I mentioned it as a reference WITHOUT
commenting on how or how well it works.

Some people might not understand that calling it a "fine piece of
design" meant you didn't like it :-)


** The ABX switching box is a device ( ie a piece of design) - and since I
have never seen one I expressed no personal opinion about it.

However, I made NO mention WHATEVER of the ABX testing procedure - so
it is utterly ** FALSE and ABSURD ** to claim that I praised it.

Comes as no surprise to me that smug, congenital ****heads like Payne and
Arny saw no problem in doing exactly that.

Why don't you write half a page of unemotional reasoned argument on
why you think the ABX method is flawed and/or unnecessarily
complicated? Then we just might be inclined to take you seriously.

Or you could serve up some more personal abuse. Would that be more
fun? :-)