Frequency response of the ear
"Keith G" wrote in message
OK, just another rickety excuse for a bit of SET-bashing,
then?
In reply to how many dozen bits of SET-worship from you, Keith?
Fine, but as usual and like the other SS bigots in
here, you have got all lathered up and run orf in the
wrong direction - let me simplify the difference between
SET and SS setups for you:
let me do the same -
SET - added inconvenience, expense and audible distortion.
SS - inaudible distortion and also far more convenient to obtain and use.
Think of the difference between a 'SET/horns' setup and a
'normal' setup as being like a live 'Theatre Sound'
and also live sound, AKA "public address systems", "DJ systems", and
"Rock-and-roll concert" systems. They are all based on high efficiency
transducers driven by powerful SS amplfiers.
Ooops, in practice, no SET amplifiers in sight. Thus the inclusion of SETs
must be completely gratuitous and unfounded.
versus a 'Cinema Sound' where the 'Theatre Sound' is
realistic and lifelike with clarity, depth and 3D imaging
rather than *impressive* and that 'Cinema Sound' gives
you greater amounts of 2D 'dynamics' and trouser-flapping
bass. OK?
Confused small conflagration of words summing up to total nonsense.
|