Frequency response of the ear
"Arny Krueger" wrote in message
...
"Keith G" wrote in message
OK, just another rickety excuse for a bit of SET-bashing,
then?
In reply to how many dozen bits of SET-worship from you, Keith?
Fine, but as usual and like the other SS bigots in
here, you have got all lathered up and run orf in the
wrong direction - let me simplify the difference between
SET and SS setups for you:
let me do the same -
Go for it!
SET - added inconvenience, expense and audible distortion.
Horse****....
SS - inaudible distortion and also far more convenient to obtain and use.
Since when does 'convenient' substitute for 'preferable' unless you are
*very* lazy?
Think of the difference between a 'SET/horns' setup and a
'normal' setup as being like a live 'Theatre Sound'
and also live sound, AKA "public address systems", "DJ systems", and
"Rock-and-roll concert" systems. They are all based on high efficiency
transducers driven by powerful SS amplfiers.
Sound source is not sound reproduction, otherwise a *distorted guitar* would
be inadmissible and Public address systems come under the heading of 'Cinema
Sound' in my book - you've obviously never been to a live theatre.......
Ooops, in practice, no SET amplifiers in sight. Thus the inclusion of SETs
must be completely gratuitous and unfounded.
Confused small conflagration of words summing up to total nonsense....
versus a 'Cinema Sound' where the 'Theatre Sound' is
realistic and lifelike with clarity, depth and 3D imaging
rather than *impressive* and that 'Cinema Sound' gives
you greater amounts of 2D 'dynamics' and trouser-flapping
bass. OK?
Confused small conflagration of words summing up to total nonsense.
OK, I can see you got lost, so I'll simplify for you:
'Theatre Sound' = realistic and lifelike with clarity, depth and 3D imaging.
'Cinema Sound' = you greater amounts of 2D 'dynamics' and trouser-flapping
bass.
Did that do it?
cue Plowie 'bout now - he always like to try and get the boot in when
someone else is in the fray...
:-)
|