Jim Lesurf wrote:
In article , Keith G
wrote:

Also from the 'lay POV', I would like to say that the trouble with these
'snake oil bashing' sessions is that they are never cut and dried
conclusive

Afraid you have missed the point of my posting(s). They are not what you
assert. They are to bring scientifically critical thinking to assessing a
document which is presented by its authors/publishers to provide a
'scientific' basis for their claims.


Well, yes, and that's fine of course. As a few have pointed out, you are
using up a fair amount of energy before you've questioned the source
(Ben Duncan). Not rocket science, but not a bad place to start on your
critical thought?

Rob