"Rob" wrote in message
TT wrote:
"Rob" wrote in message
om...
TT wrote:
"Rob" wrote in message
om...
TT wrote:
"cd" wrote in message
...
On Fri, 3 Jul 2009 11:19:38 +0100, "Godfrey Wilkes"
wrote:

"cd" wrote in message
...
Do you have a family history of Tourettes?
How did it spread to your hands?
Best not to feed the trolls but here's an interesting link on the
subject:

http://members.iinet.com.au/~rutlidge/alanindex.html

But there are trolls and TROLLS.

Phil is actually *so* amusing.
Let's just get this absolutely correct here CD! First off, the
author of the link, Alan Rutlidge (who is a personal friend of mine)
has had an exasperating time with Philthy (Phil Allison's pet name)
and everything written in that is correct and all the quotes of
Philthy's are his. If in doubt search the archives.

Obviously, little of that page makes any sense without context. Your
point relates to PA's medical condition.

Philthy is a netstalking psychopath and Bipolar suffer.
How do you know this? Are you (and Arrny) qualified to make a medical
diagnosis?

Philthy at one
stage even *paid for* a corporate search on Alan's business and then
rang and harassed Alan's business partner! Unproved but there is
strong suspicion here even wrote letters to Alan's local council and
complained that his business was not operating within the zoning
restrictions!

OK

I have known Philthy online for many years now and can assure you
that he is not a nice person at all. It is easy to be lulled into a
sense of his outlandish behaviour is a little humorous or good
natured as with someone like Billy Connolly but I can assure you
there is nothing but malice hiding behind it.

Your evidence is that suspicion, above? And you link that suspicion to
a medical condition. Have I got this right? Continuing.

Philthy is a social outcast, he is nearly 60 years old and lives
alone in a rented flat and as far as women goes he is still a virgin.
He had a strong Catholic upbringing and went to Kogarah Maris
Brothers school where it is strongly suspected he was "got at" by one
of them and so explaining his disposition now. He is very
intelligent but has *NO* formal qualifications, not even a driver's
licence and he even dropped out of (thrown out of?) a fully funded
scholarship in Engineering at Sydney Uni in the early1970's. The real
reason has never been discovered but the common belief is there was
an incident, with a male lecturer in the orchestra pit ;-)
Apparently he lecturer was also dismissed.

Is any of that supposed to be funny or incriminating?

Philthy operates a hobby business from his kitchen table in his
rented flat repairing various bits of electronic gear that obviously
subsidises what ever benefits he is on.

Again - what's the point of that sentence. Is anyone supposed to draw
something negative?

His hi-fi gear consists of an ancient Sony CDP-101 (the first CD
player on the market), Aiwa tuner, some old guitar amps, some kit
speakers and sometimes a loaned set of Quad ESL57s or 63s, various
other bits of curbside collectable rubbish and about 80CDs. There is
also a very amusing story of when Philthy bought some dodgy Quad ESL
63s and had to sue the dealer to get his money back after he tinkered
with then. But we will save that for another day ;-)

Please, do.

So basically you are dealing with a sad and pathetic excuse for a
human being whose whole life is an abject failure! He even wrote
once how he was smarter than a friend of his he went to school with
(Jim Prendergast) who is a PhD. This bitter and twisted waste of
space and oxygen thief tries to make himself important by being this
big and knowledgeable expert online.

Really.

My advice is to killfile him and do not under any circumstances
divulge any personal information or have private contact with him
because you *will be* stalked. I know from personal experience :-(

Obviously, yes, killfile, no PhD needed.

It's rather difficult to sort out the basis of what you're saying. Are
you homophobic? Do you dislike people with mental health disabilities?
Have you the slightest idea about bipolar disorder? I think not. Find
out what it can be and reread what you've written, and reconsider how
incisive and astute you really are.

It would have been better if you'd stuck to what you know, and your
personal stalking experiences. It would have been nice if you'd just
not bothered, or simply passed on the killfile advice.

If there is anything about this you disbelieve or think I am even
exaggerating please do your own research and you will quickly see
that I am probably being too kind to him ;-)

Yes, quite magnanimous TT ;-)

Rob
I'm not entirely sure whether you are defending Philthy or having a go
at me for giving CD here a quick run down on Philthy's background.

Neither really, just trying unsuccessfully to clarify your onslaught.

Either way, it matters little to me. As with any information you may
do with it what you will.

As with any seemingly bigoted rant, I have.

Rob

May I enquire why *you* call me a bigot?


It should be obvious if you read my questions. I note of course that you
haven't answered any.

Perhaps re-ask and this time leave out any snide remarks ;-)


I have answered a relevant, on topic post, politely and courteously and
try and warn the OP of the *proven* and *documented* dangers of the
person he asked about and you a) try and defend the person b) malign me


I'm asking you to elaborate on the proof and documents.

The proof is Philthy's own words and the documentation is the Google
Archives. See below as an example.

http://groups.google.com/group/aus.e...e=source&hl=en
here is where Philthy talks about his schooling and being a Uni drop out.
Feel free to do your own research yourself *IF* you think I have in anyway
mislead you or anyone else.

I'm not defending Phil and you malign yourself.

Please elaborate how I malign myself. I am having a polite and civil
conversation with you as I do 99% of the time with people I meet on Usenet
and I have answered a post discussing a person and my comments have been
civil and on topic.


For the record, it is not me that is the public menace.


Well, not *the* public menace, granted ;-)

Here you go again. Are you insinuating that I am some sort of other menace
then? If so, please state your grievences openly.

Cheers TT