TT wrote:
snipped for readability purposes


How do you know Phil's medical condition?

It has been openly discussed on and off groups and MDs have
offered their opinion.


I'm afraid I simply don't believe that a suitably qualified MD offered a
diagnosis on a public forum. Do you have evidence?

Do you think that Phil's medical condition as diagnosed is
a cause for his actions?

Yes and a very nasty disposition mixed in for good measure.

Also, do you think it's a good idea to declare a medical
condition like this on the internet?

Yes. He has freely discussed other people's medical
conditions and even disclosed a person's criminal record.

What is the relevance of the same sex encounter you claim
Phil has had?

This explains his obsession with all things anal and his
homophobic tendencies.


Yes, you've obviously not understood. Indeed, your using the very
techniques you criticise to create your case.

I don't know Phil Allison as well as you - I only know what I've seen on
a NG (and even then it's not that reliable). However, I see his bad
language as an extreme vernacular. You obviously feel you've
witnessed/experienced something far more serious.

What relevance is Phil's occupation and employment status?

It shows he lacks creditability. It also demonstrates why
he detests anyone with qualifications. The more highly
qualified someone is the more Philthy is likely to have a go
at them.


I find it perfectly reasonable to accept that someone without
qualifications knows more than one with.

What relevance is Phil's tenure, age and religious
background?

It demonstrates why he has such a nasty disposion and why he
has so much time on his hands. Basically it says why he is
a grumpy old man ;-)


Do you not see why you're a bigot? A lot of people are. Just learn to
describe yourself as a bigot.

If your answers to any of these questions have anything to
do with your hatred of Phil, please explain.

My dislike of your pal is solely because how he treats
people and because of the disgusting things he has written
about me, my family and my friends. Yes, it's personal.


Phil isn't my 'pal'. I don't know him. Neither do you, from the lack of
evidence you've offered.

http://groups.google.com/group/aus.e...e=source&hl=en
here is where Philthy talks about his schooling and being
a Uni drop out. Feel free to do your own research
yourself *IF* you think I have in anyway mislead you or
anyone else.

That post says Phil left University for financial and
personal reasons. You persecute him for that ('university
dropout').

See above about qualifications, it goes a long way as to
explaining why he is the way he is.


How? What's this thing you've got with 'qualifications'?

You really are a prick TT.

Your opinion and you get to keep it. So what title do
bestow on pal Philthy then? Saint? Misunderstood boy
genius? What?


I don't have an opinion of Phil beyond his potty typing and short fuse,
he seems to know his onions, and he seems to attract vicious little
net-stalkers such as you.

I work in a university and I see this most days. It's
heartbreaking, and you think it's a bit of a laugh, or
something.

Oh quite the opposite actually. I think it is tragic waste
of a human life and an institutions rescoures.

I don't think there's a single word of that post I
disagree with. The thing with PhDs is that they train you
to *do* something - research in the main. They are so
focused they're not actually that useful in themselves.
And they're certainly not an even close measure of
intelligence (whatever that is, I don't know). How do you
know about PhDs by the way?

I haven't claimed any knowledge about PhDs. Except to say
that I am close to the universty scene as well ;-)

I dread to think. I think I may even know of you.

In my view you'd be better *not* having a go at people
unless you have a decent reason.

What about years of slander, libel and abuse and accusing me
of disgusting acts? Is that a valid reason in your opinion?


No, not really, I suspect you had it coming to you. Slander? When/what
was that? Do you know each other socially then? Actually, what
disgusting acts?

What I can't figure is what a person's age, sexuality,
tenure and so forth has to do with 'on topic'.


Ask CD why he started the thread then? He asked about
Philthy's family history and I *assumed* that would also
entail his background. I have stated the facts as I
undersatnd them. I also should mention many people seem to
agree with me ;-)

However, I am insinuating that you're a bigot by asking
you a series of focused questions. I don't think it's
stretching things too much to suggest that if i've reason
to believe that if you're a bigot in your personal life,
then you're a bigot in your private life.

No I am not a bigot, I just detest how Philthy interacts on
Usenet and how he has single handedly destroyed several
newsgroups.


You are a bigot TT. By definition.

Rob