"David Looser" wrote in message
...
"TT" wrote in message
...

snipped for readability purposes


How do you know Phil's medical condition?

It has been openly discussed on and off groups

Oh well, that's *real* evidence! (not :-()

and MDs have offered their opinion.

Then they shouldn't have done, that is a clear breach of medical ethics.
In any case unless they have treated him themselves their opinion counts
for little.


My dislike of your pal

When did Rob ever describe Phil as his "pal"? It seems to be a habit of
yours to claim that other people are "defending" someone when all they are
doing is objecting to your way of making ill-informed judgements about
other people.

That's a joke right? I'm ill-informed about what an abusive little troll
Philthy is?


I kill-filed Phil a long time ago because,

I did to for a while but he would then start to prey on newbies. A quick
chat on what Philthy is and how to deal with him and the message soon got
through.

although he has much to contribute, I am not prepared to correspond with
anyone who's response to any post that contradicts his views is to launch
into a barrage of foul language. That's all I need to do, and if everyone
did that he would effectively cease to exist as far as Usenet is
concerned. Producing web-sites devoted to him, along with quack
"diagnosis" of his medical condition is IMHO utterly inappropriate.

David.

As I have attempted to explain to Rob, Philthy's whole persona is "utterly
inappropriate".

I have found exposing him for what he is and to show people how he behaves,
he quickly goes away again. Once people realise what a sad and pathetic
creature he really is he ceases to be a problem.

BTW I have had my say, I have answered Rob's questions and I shall now fade
away into the background again.

Cheers TT