"Don Pearce" wrote


[Phil Allinson]

Although he can make a useful contribution, just as often he fails to
read the problem properly, or gets a fit of foaming mouth too soon and
goes off at a tangent. All the explanation in the world won't then
make him see how he has got it all wrong. He is pathologically right.


Oh dear, where have we all heard this sort of thing before? Bit of a *stuck
record* ain't it?

(Demonstrates nicely who the *really* 'pathologically right' is, does it
not? :-)