"Arny Krueger" wrote in message
...
"Keith G" wrote


That's not a vinyl recording Brian,


OK Amy, Iain's response this morning prompts me to re-visit your reply to me
and try to work through it all.



He never said it was. He said that it was a result that might be obtained
by that means.

Can you distinguish the difference between those two situations, Kitty?


Still no idea what that means. I don't do Krooglish.



It's purportedly a
live recording from one of the self-styled
*meister-yappers* here who considers himself a bit of a
'recordist' and good enough at it, apparently, to try and
put a true industry professional like Iain Churches in
his place - constantly aided and abetted by his trusty
pooch, of course!

Note the lame and childish attempt to turn a purported technical question
into yet another stage of Kitty's ongoing personal vendetta(s).


What I do note is the lame and childish bleating from someone who can dish
it out alright (and does so continuously), but can't take it....



What I see is that, for a supposed 'stereo recording',
the tracks *appear* nearly identical throughout which
would suggest to me that either the mics are too far away
from the recording target

Since you've identified the source of the recording Kitty, let's talk
about the source of the recording, and the purpose that it served.


What, that the source of the recording served?



The recording was of a really pretty good high school chorus,


Pity you turned them into crap then, isn't it?


made in a high
school auditorium, with the goal of coming as close as possible to the
sound heard by the adjudication panel that was presiding over the event.


I didn't see the horse, but I can see where its been....



or the target material is
completely homogenous, left to right - whatever, but the
channel imbalance can only be real *sloppiness* at some
point, whether it be down to poor mic placement, poor
level settings or some cock-up in post processing...??

The first problem with the analysis provided is that it is based on what
was inherently a snapshot of just a portion of the entire event.


My analysis was based on the *entire* portion that you posted. If you had
somehow managed to record a another portion that didn't sound quite so dire
then more fool you for not posting it!



Contrary to your apparent belief Kitty, music is not static, and the
balance and any similarity between the 2 channels are not constant but
rather varies. That means that at any point in time, the channels are
likely to not be in perfect balance.


Anyway, here's what it sounds like (completely
unadulterated by me):

http://www.moirac.adsl24.co.uk/showntell/HeejusDin.wav

Childish attempt to editorialize and prejudice listeners by means of a
taunting and insulting file name noted.


I note that you noted it.




Terrible racket, ain't it?

Compared to some of your previous posts here Kitty, really not all that
bad.


No comparison with anything needed, Amy - it's a terrible racket. Period.

(As the Merkins would say....)



More to the point, it is what it is.


Indeed it is - a terrible racket.



The thing you want to compare the recording to is not available to you,
Kitty. What you need to hear to make a reasonable comparison to is the
sound heard by the adjudication panel that was presiding over the event.


Er no, I don't need to compare it with anything - like I said sad, it's crap
in its own right.



Do you know where the adjudication panel were seated, Kitty?



Is that a serious question? :-)



Do tell.


Grasping at straws now, ain'tcha? :-)



God only knows where the
nasty, *tinny* sound comes from - ****e mics, ****e mic
choices or recorded over the *phone* possibly?

The mic was a Rode NT-4.


Attempt to distract the readers noted.



http://www.rodemic.com/microphone.php?product=NT4 .

The sound quality came from the same basic place that many of the sonic
miscegenations that you have posted links to here have come from, Kitty.
The source.


Babbling now. Lost it completely I would say.

What Amy doesn't realise is that when you set yourself up as an expert or
*authority* in this world you'd better be pretty good and all he's done is
demonstrate that he very definitely *isn't* after years of 'authoritative
yap' in this ng.....

He can't win this - the clip is **** and will always be ****, he needs to
stop digging....