In article , Bob Latham
wrote:
In article , Jim Lesurf
wrote:
In article , Bob Latham
wrote:
In article , Chris
Isbell wrote:
On Sun, 29 Nov 2009 14:21:15 -0000, "Keith G"
wrote:

Why do wish to record at 192k/24bit when I thought the wisdom
you signed up to was that 44.1K/16bit was transparent to human
hearing?

Well that's wrong for a start because he didn't.

I've given up trying to explain such things to Keith because - as he
has stated - he wants an argument to 'win', and to be center-stage,
not to learn about what he doesn't understand.

I was referring to the above statement being attributed to Keith, who
did not write the above question, I did.

Sorry, didn't notice that you were responding to your own question! Lost
track of the quote indents! :-)

I've now commented elsewhere wrt my reasons for wanting a recorder like the
Tascam. Its partly for convenience - being able to make long recordings,
etc. e.g. being able to make them from something like a DTTV receiver at
48k with no resampling to 44k. Partly for a range of test/ experiment/
investigation purposes.

Slainte,

Jim

--
Please use the address on the audiomisc page if you wish to email me.
Electronics http://www.st-and.ac.uk/~www_pa/Scot...o/electron.htm
Armstrong Audio http://www.audiomisc.co.uk/Armstrong/armstrong.html
Audio Misc http://www.audiomisc.co.uk/index.html