"Bob Latham" wrote in message
...
In article ,
Jim Lesurf wrote:
In article , Bob Latham
wrote:
In article , Chris Isbell
wrote:
On Sun, 29 Nov 2009 14:21:15 -0000, "Keith G"
wrote:

Why do wish to record at 192k/24bit when I thought the wisdom you
signed up to was that 44.1K/16bit was transparent to human
hearing?

Well that's wrong for a start because he didn't.

I've given up trying to explain such things to Keith because - as he has
stated - he wants an argument to 'win', and to be center-stage, not to
learn about what he doesn't understand.

I was referring to the above statement being attributed to Keith, who did
not write the above question, I did.


Bob, I seem to be replying only to you!

Mr Lesurf has got the ****s with me because he finally (after a great deal
of patience on *my part*) caught on to the fact that I didn't need his
tediously long and involved (and usually three days late) explanations of
various points which he deemed had skated past me.

Starting with Anthropology and ending with Zoology there are *thousands* of
topics I don't need *in depth* in - electronics is just one of them. I ask
when I need to know; I'm at least 40 years too old to be lectured in what I
don't....