"Keith G" wrote in message
...
Arny Krueger wrote:
"Keith G" wrote in message

Arny Krueger wrote:
"exalted wombat" wrote in
message

There's some distortion in the sax sound at 2.44. Maybe
in the recording chain, maybe spit sound from the sax,
maybe a MP3 artifact. Whatever it is, the eq'd version
emphasises it.
The Eq'd version was done by Iain, who bungled it,
probably because he lacked the more sophisticated tools
that I used,


'Used' - like you've already done it (EQ'd the original)?

Post a link to the the result, Arny....

I'm no fool Kitty - no matter what I post, it will be ****ed on by you,
Iain and your posse.


Try to have the balls to stand by what you claim - if you are right and
your version is a better implementation of your *original suggestion* I'm
sure Iain would be the first to say so!

Indeed. To have Arny post something that actually reflects his
clasmed skills, and matched the expectations of others would be
most refreshing.