"Arny Krueger" wrote in message
...
"exalted wombat" wrote in
message

There's some distortion in the sax sound at 2.44. Maybe
in the recording chain, maybe spit sound from the sax,
maybe a MP3 artifact. Whatever it is, the eq'd version
emphasises it.

The Eq'd version was done by Iain, who bungled it, probably because he
lacked the more sophisticated tools that I used, maybe just Iain being
Iain.

It was done strictly to your instructions.
If you doubt this, please supply the correct version so that
they can be carefully compared.

Why did you not post a suggested corrected version in the first
place, using your "sophisticated tools" ? :-)

Perhaps it was because you just looked at the frequency
analysis on your PC, but did not listen carefully on a good
audio system to find out what your suggestion really sounded
like.


Your dishonesty in this matter does you no credit:-(