David Looser wrote:
"DAB sounds worse than FM" wrote
David Looser wrote:

You are in no position to talk about "posting style", yours is
bombastic.


Better than pussy footing around, IMO.

Is it? that's a matter of opinion.


IMO, yes.


And you very definitely *do* post "bull****" (which I don't)


I'm very surprised - almost taken aback - that you don't think that you
spout bull**** whereas you think I do.

LOL! Is not bull**** in the eye of the reader? You think *I* write
"bull****" because I don't write to massage your massive ego.


No, bull**** is not in the eye of the reader.


Oh, and you
appear to be unable to snip posts.

I am able to. Honest.

So why don't you then? too precious to do so are you?


I do sometimes. And I'm hardly the only person in this thread that doesn't
snip.


Ok. Enjoy the low audio quality on DAB, anyway.

If you had remembered correctly you would have remembered that I don't
listen to DAB. I get excellent FM reception and I'm more than happy to
stick with that.


So why do I recall you as someone trying to argue against me considering
that I only tend to post on this NG on DAB-related threads?


What actually *do* you remember? Not much as far as I can see.


Mainly that you took me to task from a DAB supporting perspective.


--
Steve - www.digitalradiotech.co.uk - digital radio news & info

The BBC's "justification" of digital radio switchover is based on lies