"DAB sounds worse than FM" wrote in message
...
David Looser wrote:
"DAB sounds worse than FM" wrote
David Looser wrote:

You are in no position to talk about "posting style", yours is
bombastic.


Better than pussy footing around, IMO.

Is it? that's a matter of opinion.


IMO, yes.

And IMO it depends on just how you define the terms.



No, bull**** is not in the eye of the reader.

LOL! of *course* it is! I write sense, you write bull****, isn't that what
everyone thinks?


Oh, and you
appear to be unable to snip posts.

I am able to. Honest.

So why don't you then? too precious to do so are you?

I do sometimes.

Can't say I'd noticed

And I'm hardly the only person in this thread that doesn't snip.

That's no excuse. You are simply too bone idle to snip. It shows how little
interest you have in presenting your case well. You want us to simply take
what you say on trust because *you* say it.


Ok. Enjoy the low audio quality on DAB, anyway.


What actually *do* you remember? Not much as far as I can see.


Mainly that you took me to task from a DAB supporting perspective.


In other words all you remember is an impression. I've never "supported"
DAB, and if you can't remember that it says little for your ability to
remember. FYI what I did do was to criticise your obsessive approach to the
issue, but I guess you can't tell the difference as you have personalised
the whole issue. You are Mr "DAB sucks", so you take criticism of your
obsessive style as support for DAB, and visa-versa.

David.