"Dave Plowman (News)" wrote in
message
In article ,
Laurence Payne wrote:
On Fri, 12 Feb 2010 11:24:31 +0000 (GMT), "Dave Plowman
(News)" wrote:

An endorsement from one who says he doesn't care about
speech quality is hardly going to mean much, now, is it?

Why not? Music is about sound. Voice is about
intelligibility

With respect, crap.

Agreed, other than hard core communications audio. And, I'm not so sure
about that.

It's like people who want speakers that are good for jazz or good for
classical music or rock.

What would differ in the technical specs for speakers that would be tasked
to any of these 3 genres of music?

Anything at all?

I enjoy the sound of the human voice. In the same way as
I might enjoy the sound of waves lapping on the shore. Or
the wind in the trees.

IME a speaker that would do a good job of reproducting *any* voice in high
fideltiy would need response from no more than 85 Hz to no less than 12 KHz.

It seems strange to me that any reading this sort of
group doesn't think the same. If all they are interested
in is music, they're in the wrong group. As I've said
many many times before.

Last time I looked the name of the group is uk.rec.audio, not
uk.rec.amateur.music.listening.only.