I gather that you prefer to resort to the "Do you know who you are
talking to" approach rather than justify your words logically.

The ad hominem approach was started by you, not me. If you are now
content to drop that side of it, then that's fine by me.

I doesn't surprise me that you want words to be "justified logically".
Engineering about psychology is about as useful as dancing about
architecture. While you may live in a world of convergent thinking and
mathematical formulae there are numerous other aspects of human
experience that exist on other levels and to dismiss these as
"twaddle" really says more about your own primary focus and the
assumptions you make.

Do you read poetry, for instance? Or do all words have to be justified
logically to have any currency?

Andy