In article , Rob
wrote:
On 06/07/2010 17:40, Jim Lesurf wrote:
In , Rob
wrote:
Why do belt drive turntables, usually British, have noisy motors? Is
it really beyond the wit of designers/manufacturers to use a quiet
motor?

I've just bought a Roksan Xerxes, curiosity buy, and the motor
vibrates to the point that it can be felt through the plinth.
Apparently (having been through forums etc) this is quite normal.
It's a testimony to the design that very little of this finds its way
to the platter or arm, but why bother designing in such compromise,
only to have to design it out?

Reverse the above to understand the reasoning. :-) A belt drive
becomes appopriate *because* a noisy (i.e. vibration prone) motor was
chosen by the maker. The combination of the belt and the turntable
then act as a mechanical filter.


Really!? What an utter shambles. Every motor vibrates - but they don't
have to physically shake the chassis they're mounted on.

Well, you may have a 'rogue' example in need of sorting out. Can't say as I
have no idea of what is normal for your turntable. But any vibration will
"shake the chassis" to some extent. Just a question of how noticable it is,
or if it is a problem.

Can you make a recording using a test disc and check for wow, flutter, and
rumble, etc? That way you can see if it matters. Or is it clearly audible
though the speakers with the volume at a normal setting?

Slainte,

Jim

--
Please use the address on the audiomisc page if you wish to email me.
Electronics http://www.st-and.ac.uk/~www_pa/Scot...o/electron.htm
Armstrong Audio http://www.audiomisc.co.uk/Armstrong/armstrong.html
Audio Misc http://www.audiomisc.co.uk/index.html