On Tue, 20 Jul 2010 10:53:55 +0100, "Keith G"
wrote:

Possibly '3D imaging' is a poor choice phrase as it seems to imply the rigid
soundstage that audiophiles have to have, to me it just means a solid (as in
side to side/front to back) quality of the sound that helps separate the
various instruments, not portraying the *layout* of the various sounds.

Yup, definitely a Humpty!

I don't think you can wriggle '3D imaging' into merely IMPLYING a
stereo soundstage (which for some reason you choose to rubbish?) It
clearly states it.