"Laurence Payne" wrote in message
...
On Tue, 20 Jul 2010 10:53:55 +0100, "Keith G"
wrote:

Possibly '3D imaging' is a poor choice phrase as it seems to imply the
rigid
soundstage that audiophiles have to have, to me it just means a solid (as
in
side to side/front to back) quality of the sound that helps separate the
various instruments, not portraying the *layout* of the various sounds.

Yup, definitely a Humpty!

I don't think you can wriggle '3D imaging' into merely IMPLYING a
stereo soundstage (which for some reason you choose to rubbish?) It
clearly states it.



Well it most definitely makes you a Dumpty - I suspect you know what I mean
but, like one or two others here, like to continue the debate...??

Once again: where's the soundstage on the mono disks I play where the sax
player, for example, is sounding he 'is in the room' - ie 'solid/real'...??
Eh? Eh? Anyway, enough about me, what do you have for the pot, Lozzer?
Anything of interest? - It hasn't taken long to get into this 'Attack Pack
chasing after lil' ole me' situation again and I'm actually the one who
don't give a fart in a paper bag what people think of what I do, my kit or
my preferences!

While I was offline I had people (Bob Latham last time) wailing about how
pointless a silent forum is and yet they don't ****ing post anything!
Despite I might look like the only one on the planet actually doing anything
(You Tube videos at present) I can't keep pulling fascinating, new and
strictly 'on topic' audio out of arse - not with the Attack Pack looking for
their chance all time time...

Time was there were plenty of people up to stuff here - anybody remember
these:

http://www.lurcher.org/ukra/


??

****ing state that page is in an' all....