"Andre Jute" wrote in message

On Sep 6, 3:26 pm, "Arny Krueger"
wrote:
"Eeyore"
m
wrote in
. com

Andre Jute wrote:
The QUAD CD expects to see at least 10K impedance on
its outputs.
I suspect you are misreading the spec. I expect that is
the 'nominal' load but I'd be VERY surprised if it can't
drive a lower impedance. Without schematics to hand I
couldn't give a precise figure.

For openers, the title "QUAD CD" does not describe a
single piece of equipment, or even a single family of
related products. There are at two families of Quad CD
players, the 67 family and the 99 family. The Quad 99
series players further compound the situation by having
two different sets of outputs with very difference
performance specs.

I suspect that Jute is basing his alleged specification
on the standard IHFM line level load which includes a
10K resistive component. If that's the case then he's
still in error because the proper way to address that
load is with a device that expects to see 10K or *less*.

You're a blustering idiot, Krueger.

Jute, it is true that getting sucked into responding to one of your posts
takes a certain amount of either optimism (that you would have finally grown
a brain) or idiocy (expecting you to change your behavior).

This is from the QUAD
official literature of the CD66 and it states "10K
minimum*: " Audio Output: 2Vrms maximum. 300mV on normal
progamme material. Minimum load impedance 10kR."

Jute, I see that you've already assigned fault to me for not being able to
read your mind and somehow know which Quad CD player you were whining about.

Far be it from you to take responsibility for making a unnecessarily vague
post.