On Oct 16, 5:44*am, "Geoff Mackenzie" wrote:
"Boon" wrote in message

...



On Oct 15, 4:52 pm, ScottW wrote:
On Oct 15, 2:40 pm, Boon wrote:

On Oct 15, 4:17 pm, "Fed Up Lurker"
wrote:

Did you really have them playing in your system? If you did then you
would've taken a few pictures of yourself posing beside them. upload
the pix to something like Flickr, I only suggest this so as to cast
aside
any doubts some may have....

Or, you could look at my blog (the one you said that you read, heh
heh) and see the evidence.

I Live in Austria, I'll be having a word with one or two peeps...

When you're proven wrong, will you be a man about it and admit it?

*I noticed Boon refuses to address the salient points made about their
anemic bass response.

That's because I don't hear an anemic bass response. The last time I
heard an anemic bass response was when you tried to set your Quad ESLs
on rickety wooden footstools. THAT was anemic.

*I'm sure they would benefit greatly from even a modest subwoofer, but
sub integration is beyond Boons setup knowledge.

Except for the fact that I've reviewed subwoofers and had the
manufacturers stop by to determine if I had set them up properly...and
I had. The proof is in print.

---personal abuse snipped----

For many years I used Quad ESL63s with the excellent REL sub. *Did you
"review" this combination? *

No, I did not.

Where can I find the "proof in print"?

Of something I didn't do? Hmmm.