View Single Post
  #15 (permalink)  
Old November 24th 10, 04:20 PM posted to uk.rec.audio
Don Pearce[_3_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,358
Default To reverb or not?

On Wed, 24 Nov 2010 16:58:43 -0000, "Keith G"
wrote:


"Don Pearce" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 24 Nov 2010 16:37:34 +0000, David Kennedy
wrote:

Don Pearce wrote:
On Wed, 24 Nov 2010 15:46:13 -0000, "Keith G"
wrote:


"Iain wrote in message
...

"Keith wrote in message
...

Something I have been wondering about is adding reverb to recordings.

This:

http://www.moirac.adsl24.co.uk/shown...octurne%20.wav

is a recent effort of Swimbo on the alto that I rather like but
without
any reverb applied. Would anyone consider reverb to be necessary in
this
instance? I do rather get the impression that some people consider a
little reverb to be essential on just about everything..??


Purely a matter of taste. For me it's a tad dry, but I much
prefer this to the other extreme.



Hi Iain, try this one with a little 'Bright Hall' reverb added - I
hafta say
I quite like it myself:

http://www.moirac.adsl24.co.uk/shown...ght%20Hall.wav


But I would want to be in the habit of sloshing it into everything I
record
unless I have to, of course - it's only me recording Swim on either the
alto
sax or the Bb clart.




But all the better if she can just accompany herself.

http://www.soundthoughts.co.uk/listen/accomp.mp3

d
Yeuch!

Come back Mantovani, all is forgiven...


He couldn't do interesting discords though.




Don, if anything, it needed a little help the other way - not making sound
*worse*!!!


Just for laughs. Sometimes worse is better.

d