"Iain Churches" wrote in message
...

"Don Pearce" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 25 Nov 2010 10:39:02 -0000, "Keith G"
wrote:

Yer, 'tis - a nalto. This one in fact:

http://www.moirac.adsl24.co.uk/showntell/Selmer.jpg

Swim wanted to max out the sax thing for once and for all and went for
this
rather pricey but nice Selmer. Cab't fault the tone, it sounds beautiful
and
Moira says it plays like a dream - big step up from the worthy but
somewhat
agricultural eBayArbiter she started out on.


Someone's been busy with the Brasso. Must be an evening's work getting
that to shine. But yes, it is easy to hear the quality in the tone.

Neither Brasso nor Duraglit (used in vast amounts by brass
and silver bands) is required on modern lacquered saxophones,
just an occasional flick with a duster to remove dust and
finger prints. Modern lacquers are also more resistant to
scratches and rubbing wear to the finish seen on so many
vintages saxes, and known as affectionately as "jazz"

Just as audiophiles discuss the differences in connecting cables,
reed players discuss the differences in the sounds of the various
finishes available for saxophones - just one of the many variables
that can give each player his/her individual tone. However,
unlike perhaps the cable debate the differences are clearly audible.
For example my black lacquered Custom Z tenor has a darker
sound than the gold lacquer version which in itself is slightly less
bright than the bare brass version.

http://www.mosabackabigband.com/Pics...stomZBlack.gif

Copper is the choice for of many classical players who, like
Keith's good lady, also tend to go for French made saxophones.

http://www.mosabackabigband.com/Pics/CopperAlto.jpg




Lovely pix, lovely saxes.

I love the different finishes and can well imaging they would make a player
'pull his socks up' when using them, but I'm tending to agree with Don on
the appearance and finish affecting the sound thing. It would be most
interesting to hear a conparison if such a thing was available.