In article , Iain Churches
wrote:

"Jim Lesurf" wrote in message
...


I presume you have applied them literally as described in Iain's
initial pair of statements. If so, that doesn't seem to be what he
meant.

If we use D = delay and R = reverb then we may also need a different
function, say, C = delay plus current input.

So although comparing DR with RD should give the same result, if we
change one of the Ds to a C they generally won't. The problem is to
clarify the language to distinguish these.



The problem seems to be that the word "delay" is used a both a noun and
a verb.

No. The problem was that you used the word "delay" to describe two
*different* processes. One was a simple delay. The other was generating a
delayed version and combining it with an undelayed version (or looped back
and re-delayed, but you said that wasn't what you meant.)

Slainte,

Jim

--
Please use the address on the audiomisc page if you wish to email me.
Electronics http://www.st-and.ac.uk/~www_pa/Scot...o/electron.htm
Armstrong Audio http://www.audiomisc.co.uk/Armstrong/armstrong.html
Audio Misc http://www.audiomisc.co.uk/index.html