In article , Iain Churches
wrote:

Now, to delay (verb not noun) the reverb.

Afraid I could not find anywhere in your descriptions you adding "(noun not
verb)" to your use of "delay" to signify that was where you think the word
was a "noun". Can you quote the case(s) where this you think this is so in
your posting above? And explain why?

My own understanding is that both "delay" and "reverb" are actions applied
to some "object" - in the forms of a stream of audio info. Thus "verbs". So
I'm still not clear why you think anyone else would follow what you've been
saying about that.

Also, did you use exactly the same time delay in every case, and exactly
the same 'reverb' process settings, etc? If not, then how would hearing any
differences in the results demonstrate your original assertion was true -
which made no statements about changing such factors? And only spoke of the
ordering of two different processes, not mentioning all the different
"ways" you have now added.


There are two ways to do this.

So again, you use one description for different things. :-)

Would it help if I quoted your original statement, and your original
explanation (which didn't mention this new "verb"/"noun" idea)?

Slainte,

Jim

--
Please use the address on the audiomisc page if you wish to email me.
Electronics http://www.st-and.ac.uk/~www_pa/Scot...o/electron.htm
Armstrong Audio http://www.audiomisc.co.uk/Armstrong/armstrong.html
Audio Misc http://www.audiomisc.co.uk/index.html