"Dave Plowman (News)" wrote in message
...
In article ,
David Looser wrote:
"Keith G" wrote

No, but I certainly think good analogue beats digital in anything
which interacts with the human senses.


Do you? what leads you to that conclusion? (apart from blind prejudice,
that is)

My guess is 'analogue' to Keith is purely vinyl.


Nope. Holds up for TV, radio, watches, photography, some meters &c. but I
can't ignore the 'cheap, quick and convenient' aspects of digital
photography and sound recording which are both good enough for my purposes.