"Don Pearce" wrote in message
...
On Fri, 25 Nov 2011 15:18:58 +0000 (GMT), Jim Lesurf
wrote:

In article , Don Pearce
wrote:
On Fri, 25 Nov 2011 14:18:30 +0000 (GMT), Jim Lesurf
wrote:

In article , Dave Plowman (News)
wrote:
In article , Jim Lesurf
wrote:
Would you check the end of the second paragraph from the top?

Ah. You mean it should read more like "sound quality was quite
inferior *to* what we"

Yup.

Now fixed that and some other typos and late corrections from 'the
engineers'. :-)


Still doesn't look right - missing the "what". Or isn't it uploaded yet?

Boooger. I'll fix that. Your pointing this out also prompted a flurry
of argument between me and 'higher management' (my wife) over the
alternative "that which" phrasing, but I prefer "what".

Jim

Maybe technically correct, but "that which" is awfully clumsy. I'd go
for the fluent read every time.

.... the sound quality was quite inferior to what's expected today.

Sound most fluent and correct to me.

--

Brian Gregory. (In the UK)

To email me remove the letter vee.