View Single Post
  #3 (permalink)  
Old December 14th 03, 09:05 PM posted to uk.rec.audio
Jim H
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 129
Default Listening Comparison 4

Not much in it.

Without an ABX (which I know you wouldn't care about anyway) difficult to
tell the difference.
Treble clearer on the 2s(?)

Btw, not seen an mp4 in a while! IIRC, isn't it a propietry format named
to dupe people into thinking it's the successor of mp3 (instead of mpro3)?
Maybe I've got my wires crossed.

With all this ripping maybe try this link
http://cdexos.sourceforge.net/downloads.php - dead easy little ripper that
supports the newer formats and IME gets data from scratched CDs after EAC
threw them out.


On Sun, 14 Dec 2003 21:32:56 -0000, Keith G wrote:


OK, I've given in to unrelenting popular demand and posted yet another
Listening Comparison.

**** simple this one, in each of the following 3 sets, which tracks sound
the better - the 01s or 02s?

(All files under 5 Mb)


http://www.apah69.dsl.pipex.com/keit...t1-track01.mp3

http://www.apah69.dsl.pipex.com/keit...t1-track02.mp4



http://www.apah69.dsl.pipex.com/keit...t2-track01.mp3

http://www.apah69.dsl.pipex.com/keit...t2-track02.mp4



http://www.apah69.dsl.pipex.com/keit...t3-track01.mp3

http://www.apah69.dsl.pipex.com/keit...t3-track02.mp4







--
Jim H jh
@333
.org