View Single Post
  #11 (permalink)  
Old February 13th 12, 10:00 PM posted to uk.rec.audio,uk.tech.broadcast
charles
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 44
Default Audio Precision System One Dual Domani Measuirement Systems

In article , David Looser
wrote:
"J G Miller" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 12 Feb 2012 15:56:08 +0000, Dave Plowman (News) wrote:

In article , Bill Wright
wrote:
It wasn't a US invasion by the way. It was a United Nations invasion.

The UN wasn't formed then. More than a year after D-day.


There is a subtle difference between "United Nations" as used by
William Wright and "UN" as used by yourself.

Surely you would accept what is written on the UN web site?

http://www.un.ORG/en/aboutun/history/index.shtml

snip


Nevertheless its incorrect to call the D-day landings a "United Nations"
invasion.


D-day was not planned and authorised by the 26 signatories of the
embryonic United Nations, rather it was a US-lead action that involved
only a few other nations, in particular, of course, the UK.



Not US led. The CiC of the invasion force was British


So it was an "allied powers" invasion, not a "United Nations" one.


David.


--
From KT24

Using a RISC OS computer running v5.16